Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who Is a Better Bowler in All Formats?
Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning spell in the second T20I against India at the MCG. His exceptional bowling made India’s top order collapse, leaving them unable to recover.
Hazlewood’s Impactful Spell
In that match, Hazlewood claimed three crucial wickets—Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma—finishing with figures of 3 for 13 in four overs. His new-ball control dismantled India’s batting lineup, restricting them to only 125 runs.
Bumrah’s Performance in Response
India hoped Jasprit Bumrah could produce a similar spell to turn the game around. However, despite picking up two wickets for 26 runs, he conceded runs early and couldn’t create the same impact. His wickets came after the match had already tilted toward Australia.
Comparing Overall Careers
While Hazlewood’s recent performance sparked debate, Bumrah holds stronger numbers when considering all formats. Across Tests, ODIs, and T20Is, Bumrah maintains a better average and strike rate, reflecting greater consistency and effectiveness.
“Bumrah is often projected as the best pacer of contemporary cricket.”
Conclusion
Although Hazlewood’s recent spell reignited discussions, statistical evidence still favors Bumrah as the more complete bowler across formats.
Author’s Summary: A brilliant T20I spell by Hazlewood reignited comparisons, yet Bumrah’s all-format record confirms him as the more consistent and versatile bowler.