Can anyone really blame David Kampf for signing a four-year deal that pays him an average of $2.4 million a season to play hockey? This is a solid contract by any measure in the NHL.
Moreover, David Kampf secured a limited no-trade clause, which gives him some control over his future team placements. This clause adds significant value to his contract and demonstrates smart negotiating on his part.
"Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four year deal that will see him on average earn $2.4M a season to play hockey?"
"Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?"
David Kampf’s contract reflects a fair deal, giving him both financial security and some trade autonomy, making it unreasonable to fault him for the terms agreed upon.
This situation highlights how a player’s savvy contract management can secure both a stable income and leverage in career decisions.
Would you like the tone to be more formal or conversational?